Deterministic output agreement
Reference execution and GPU-routed expert execution generated identical output across the fixed qualification corpus
Evidence
Measured results with explicit scopeThe evidence separates deterministic output qualification, a controlled earlier warm-path test, real NVIDIA L4 validation, and historical CPU baselines. None of these results is presented as completed GPU-native generation or commercial throughput.
Each result answers a specific engineering question. No card below is a claim about completed production throughput.
Reference execution and GPU-routed expert execution generated identical output across the fixed qualification corpus
Earlier host-driven NVIDIA L4 test: 1.3798886916 to 1.5612554031 generated tokens/s; not current GPU-native throughput
The controlled batching test reduced warm-path synchronization operations from 6,144 to 768
The NVIDIA-L4-qualified GPU foundation uses no intermediate production maps or readbacks
1 / Does it produce correct output?
A CPU reference that reproduces the production expert input/output boundary and the GPU-routed expert path produced identical greedy generated output across the fixed qualification corpus. This establishes a correctness reference for deeper GPU integration without implying that every ordinary CPU control run must match.
2 / Has reducing host work helped?
Controlled NVIDIA L4 alternating-order result from an earlier host-driven GPU-expert path. It is not the current GPU-native loop, production throughput, or evidence that the ≥10 TPS target is achieved.
3 / Has the GPU path run on real hardware?
Request-local hidden and residual state, authoritative WGPU device reuse, and non-mappable intermediate buffers.
Persistent F32 and native Q8_0 weights, GPU GEMV, embedding lookup, request scratch, and binding-limit chunking; NVIDIA-L4 qualified.
RMSNorm and residual transitions, grouped per-head Q/K normalization, Q/K/V projections, RoPE, and request-local F32 GPU KV append; NVIDIA-L4 qualified.
4 / What historical baselines exist?
The earlier strict Qwen Q8 CPU measurements remain useful provenance. They no longer represent the project’s top-level architecture or latest engineering milestone.
48 transformer layers × 128 experts per layer
Real LinearGate selection on the verified Qwen path
Strict checkpoint mode with no seeded fallback
Matching generated output across measured runs
Historical baseline environment
qwen3_moeHistorical CPU real-inference baseline
Cache tradeoff
Generated tokens per second by real Qwen cache configuration.
Midpoint of the observed resident-set-size range.
Critical-path expert storage wait per measured run.
| Cache configuration | Residency | Raw cache | Prompt | Decode | TTFT | Hit rate | Misses | Data read | SSD stall | RSS |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 768 slots | 12.5% | 3.59 GiB | 0.306 tok/s | 0.330 tok/s | 101.513 s | 53.04% | 28,492 | 142.96 GB | 429.98 s | 9.9–10.2 GiB |
| 1,536 slots | 25% | 7.18 GiB | 0.502 tok/s | 0.551 tok/s | 61.780 s | 71.9% | 17,043 | 85.7 GB | 231.9 s | 17.8–18.1 GiB |
Synthetic cache matrix
Benchmark iterations per second across cache configurations.
Resident expert hit rate under the skewed synthetic workload.
Foreground storage stall during the synthetic run.
| Cache slots | Residency | Raw cache | Synthetic iterations/s | Hit rate | Misses | I/O share | SSD stall |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 384 | 6.25% | 1.79 GiB | 101.502 | 92.79875% | 5,761 | 65.58% | 63.5101 s |
| 768 | 12.50% | 3.59 GiB | 125.761 | 94.68625% | 4,251 | 49.05% | 31.9680 s |
| 1,536 | 25.00% | 7.18 GiB | 76.703 | 96.13625% | 3,091 | 29.54% | 14.1372 s |
| 2,976 | 48.44% | 13.91 GiB | 60.212 | 96.6575% | 2,674 | 27.27% | 12.9498 s |
The 768-slot configuration produced the highest synthetic iteration rate, but that result did not transfer to real learned Qwen routing. Synthetic routing is useful for systems analysis but cannot replace full-transformer validation.
Methodology
These results are internal benchmark measurements from the listed configuration. Reproduction artifacts and independent third-party validation remain part of the ongoing validation roadmap.
5 / What has not been proven?